A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process

نویسندگان

  • Glyn Elwyn
  • Marie Anne Durand
  • Julia Song
  • Johanna Aarts
  • Paul J Barr
  • Zackary Berger
  • Nan Cochran
  • Dominick Frosch
  • Dariusz Galasiński
  • Pål Gulbrandsen
  • Paul K J Han
  • Martin Härter
  • Paul Kinnersley
  • Amy Lloyd
  • Manish Mishra
  • Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez
  • Isabelle Scholl
  • Kounosuke Tomori
  • Lyndal Trevena
  • Holly O Witteman
  • Trudy Van der Weijden
چکیده

Objectives To revise an existing three-talk model for learning how to achieve shared decision making, and to consult with relevant stakeholders to update and obtain wider engagement.Design Multistage consultation process.Setting Key informant group, communities of interest, and survey of clinical specialties.Participants 19 key informants, 153 member responses from multiple communities of interest, and 316 responses to an online survey from medically qualified clinicians from six specialties.Results After extended consultation over three iterations, we revised the three-talk model by making changes to one talk category, adding the need to elicit patient goals, providing a clear set of tasks for each talk category, and adding suggested scripts to illustrate each step. A new three-talk model of shared decision making is proposed, based on "team talk," "option talk," and "decision talk," to depict a process of collaboration and deliberation. Team talk places emphasis on the need to provide support to patients when they are made aware of choices, and to elicit their goals as a means of guiding decision making processes. Option talk refers to the task of comparing alternatives, using risk communication principles. Decision talk refers to the task of arriving at decisions that reflect the informed preferences of patients, guided by the experience and expertise of health professionals.Conclusions The revised three-talk model of shared decision making depicts conversational steps, initiated by providing support when introducing options, followed by strategies to compare and discuss trade-offs, before deliberation based on informed preferences.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Effect of Shared Decision-making on Decisional Conflict and Uptake of First-trimester Screening Tests

Introduction: Several factors influence women’s decision to take First Trimester Screening (FTS) tests. These factors are associated with the ambivalence of women toward undergoing screening tests.  Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) about undergoing FTS on Decisional Conflict (DC) immediately after consultation and uptake of FTS. Materials a...

متن کامل

Consultation techniques using shared decision making for patients with cancer and their families.

This article elucidates the nursing consultation techniques in shared decision making (SDM) for patients with cancer and their family members. Descriptive data (207 records) from the nurse-led SDM consultation facility and content analysis were used to extract the nursing consultation techniques. In addition, the order in which these techniques were used to structure the SDM process for patient...

متن کامل

House of Improvement Model to Enhance Prioritisation of Solutions in Decision Making: a Case Study

The decision making on selection of improvement solutions was one of the obstacles hampering the success of process improvement. This paper presents the House of Improvement (HOI) model as a guideline to link decision criteria for the prioritisation of improvement solutions. Three phases in the HOI are applied to facilitate selection and to ensure that suitable and value-added solutions are cho...

متن کامل

Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars.

OBJECTIVES To explore the views of general practice registrars about involving patients in decisions and to assess the feasibility of using the shared decision making model by means of simulated general practice consultations. DESIGN Qualitative study based on focus group interviews. SETTING General practice vocational training schemes in south Wales. PARTICIPANTS 39 general practice regi...

متن کامل

The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice

BACKGROUND General practitioners (GPs) and patients find it difficult to talk about risk of future disease, especially when patients have asymptomatic conditions, and treatment options are unlikely to cause immediate perceptible improvements in well-being. Further studies in risk communication training are needed. AIM 1) to systematically develop, describe and evaluate a complex intervention ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 359  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017